The Turkish flotilla
A more
honest man than Britain's
former UN ambassador spills the
beans on the real agenda behind the Turkish flotilla.
Press
TV now drops the veil of pretense for 'holy jihad'.
Jane
Corbin's report
for Panaroma that has had Israel haters in rage for her 'bias'!
-
she is absolutely no hasbara propagandist (despite MPAC-UK's wishful
claims) as evidenced by her tendentious
report on East
Jerusalem in January this year, 'A walk in the park'.
Soldiers
testimony at the Turkel committee - which exactly corroborates the
evidence below.
A
British naval expert analyses objectively what happened for ITV
Beyond
any doubt - the ship's passengers' motivation was lethal from the
beginning - video
testimony in Turkish and Arabic now definitively confirms this.
Detailed documentary evidence that the primary goal was not humanitarian but a strategic attempt to lift the weapons' blockade - ie to assist Hamas' war efforts.
The kind of 'peace activist' on board - one
a
convicted Turkish terrorist.
The
real character of IHH - despite the tunnel vision of Turkish
people, and many Western supporters.
An
emissary of the Vatican - jailed for gun running, released after
successive pleas from the Vatican,
on strict condition he would never return to the Middle East and back
in 10 months.
A prominent part of the welcome
committee (9 min into video, in Arabic) for the Mavi
Marmara.
An extraordinary sight as a Catholic
priest quotes scriptures to an
Islamist crowd to stir them up to cry Allahu Akbar!
A commando's official
account of events.
Another shocking and much more graphic email
account now public.
The whole event has been staged and warned about for some weeks
-
designed either to goad a violent reaction or break the arms embargo
on Gaza - with fatal consequences for yet more Gazans and some
Israelis. Early releases from usually reliable
intelligence sources now amply corroborate these assertions.
One of
the passengers interviewed during the voyage said he wanted to
die as a shahid. He said he had participated in two previous convoys and
wanted to be a shahid and twice he had been "unlucky." He was not, he
said, afraid of 'those cockroaches' (Israelis).
Hussein Urush, a senior IHH member and one of the organizers of the
flotilla, interviewed by Al-Jazeera TV a few days after the takeover
that all the passengers were prepared to die as martyrs and that the
goal of the flotilla was to reach Gaza or die trying.
Intro from Israeli MFA with abundant video evidence of the lethal
intentions of the passengers prior to naval indictment.
A
summary video from Israeli MFA - simple, factual and wholly accurate,
as
far as I can determine;
There is also now abundant documentary & video testimony of the lethal intentions of the jihadists, from the ship's own crew and from videos taken by external and local media before the conflict.
Apart
from some useful idiots aboard -
this has
little to do with aid, peace or human rights - much more to do with
Islamist ideology. The much needed aid has since been refused by Hamas.
A detailed and well referenced account of the organisers, IHH, and their weapons hoarding, bomb making past
and terrorist links from a Danish academic institute. An Israeli assessment.
A recent German
documentary featuring a prominent anti-terrorist specialist with
an interest in Turkish militants, Michale Kiefer, indicates other
militant links on the ship.
Members of BBP (Buyuk Birlik Partisi) an extreme right wing party tied
to the
murder of an Armenian Christian, were present on the ship too.
Abundant video
evidence
of the "peace activists' " lethal intentions and actions prior to any Israeli live fire
(it would have been commonplace if resistance was expected for there to
have been Israeli rubber bullets or stun grenades first from the
helicopter, but
this is officially denied)
on
the Mavi Marmara.
What
actually happened at Khaibar?
The
name of the town probably comes from the Hebrew term for friend
(hever, as with Hebron),
but the early Muslims' slaughter and savage torture,
on instruction from the 'prophet', showed quite the reverse.
A self justifying but nonetheless revealing Muslim
account of the butchery and a more sanguine
Christian one from the same Muslim sources (Sirat ArRasul esp.).
The
intemperate consummation of 'marriage' of the slain men's wives at most within a few days of their slaughter (Khaibar
is 80-90 miles from Medina)
was also at the very least a serious
violation of
the Divine Law, revealed over 2000 years before (Deut.21.11-14).
How
much Divine fury still
hangs
over the heads of these bloody
men and why do Islamists love to emulate this
wicked bloodthirst in
their
songs of 'peace'?
Don't they realise
thuggery will never ultimately prevail (Ps.76.10,
Ps.37.1-4)?
Haven't they learned that the blood they lay in wait for is actually their own! (Prov. 1.18).